Exam result oriented teaching is basically a concept whereby the trainer understands the examination contents really well and takes the students through the coursework, all the whilst holding his/her attention around the idea that the only real target is to make it possible for the individual to obtain superb marks on the examination itself , irregardless of the curriculum contents.
Even though there exists no arguing that this teaching method achieves the purpose of making certain the considerable majority of students will score very well in the examinations, one have to ask yet again - is this the proper method to educate our little children?
In fact, the system that comes with an examination result oriented approach of teaching is setting up a fictitious environment of "easy testing." This can result in a student who transfers out of this school and into one in which a far more traditional approach is practiced to suffer miserably considering that there exists no more an incredibly concise and clear understanding of exactly what to count on when it comes time for examinations.
In parallel, when a student graduates from high school and enters into college, should they happen to go to a university, or maybe a class, where by examination result oriented teaching is just not the ordinary practice, they are going to find it inevitably more challenging to show good results in that testing environment. Yet, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, students can adopt ways to do well in examinations.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these young people enter the labor force as well as real world they could discover that the utopia they've been used to, this general sense of entitlement, can bring with it a unpleasant epiphany that world is not fair. That life isn't effortless. And the sad thing is, that they are ill-prepared.
This can result in depression, confusion, and despair. This could result in an otherwise average person to function sub-par in their professions, and so create a lifelong path of underachieving; just because they were not taught through their formative years how to work hard to attain their ambitions, instead of needing every thing essentially passed to them.
Nevertheless, it is also likely that the self-assurance that was instilled by a somewhat "straightforward" education method will help to give a young adult the self-confidence to be successful in tougher situations. When presented with an unknown variable, they will feel assured that they can tackle it with grace and ease, for the reason that - after all - they have constantly been in a position to perform so.
Consequently, once they enter into the workforce and society as an adult, they are a go-getter, simply because they recognise they can be successful. It's been a proven fact of their entire life till their adult years that they carry with them through out each challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out over the real effect to society of examination outcome oriented teaching, but it is apparent that we are teaching our little ones a lesson - whether or not it is a positive lesson or a unfavorable lesson may not yet be crystal clear.
Even though there exists no arguing that this teaching method achieves the purpose of making certain the considerable majority of students will score very well in the examinations, one have to ask yet again - is this the proper method to educate our little children?
In fact, the system that comes with an examination result oriented approach of teaching is setting up a fictitious environment of "easy testing." This can result in a student who transfers out of this school and into one in which a far more traditional approach is practiced to suffer miserably considering that there exists no more an incredibly concise and clear understanding of exactly what to count on when it comes time for examinations.
In parallel, when a student graduates from high school and enters into college, should they happen to go to a university, or maybe a class, where by examination result oriented teaching is just not the ordinary practice, they are going to find it inevitably more challenging to show good results in that testing environment. Yet, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, students can adopt ways to do well in examinations.
Examination result oriented teaching causes a unrealistic perception of safety as well as confidence in life itself. A student who has been through an examination outcome oriented education isn't going to see how to recover after they have a misstep on an exam; neither do they understand how to study vigorously for any "unknown" of not being able to assert with guarantee that they without a doubt know every one of the solutions to all of the issues in life - er - to each of the questions that could be on the examination.
Although the pros are heavily weighted to the good to the college; for retention of critical funding and to the overall ease of a cookie-cutter curriculum that turns into stale and repeatable, the cons are much additional ominous for our children who're not understanding the invaluable skills of how to study on their own, or ways to study diligently for anything they want or need to attain.
When these young people enter the labor force as well as real world they could discover that the utopia they've been used to, this general sense of entitlement, can bring with it a unpleasant epiphany that world is not fair. That life isn't effortless. And the sad thing is, that they are ill-prepared.
This can result in depression, confusion, and despair. This could result in an otherwise average person to function sub-par in their professions, and so create a lifelong path of underachieving; just because they were not taught through their formative years how to work hard to attain their ambitions, instead of needing every thing essentially passed to them.
Nevertheless, it is also likely that the self-assurance that was instilled by a somewhat "straightforward" education method will help to give a young adult the self-confidence to be successful in tougher situations. When presented with an unknown variable, they will feel assured that they can tackle it with grace and ease, for the reason that - after all - they have constantly been in a position to perform so.
Consequently, once they enter into the workforce and society as an adult, they are a go-getter, simply because they recognise they can be successful. It's been a proven fact of their entire life till their adult years that they carry with them through out each challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out over the real effect to society of examination outcome oriented teaching, but it is apparent that we are teaching our little ones a lesson - whether or not it is a positive lesson or a unfavorable lesson may not yet be crystal clear.
About the Author:
The author has been a tutor for the last 5 years in Singapore, an exams grades oriented society. she gives reviews frequently in her blog on taking exams such as O levels and PSLE in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment